summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/resources/scripts/update
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-07-08remove blobutil and boards/utils needing/for blobsLeah Rowe
delete all blobs. TODO: actually deblob coreboot/uboot when downloading. i'll that in a little while, in an upcoming commit. yes. purge it all, in fsf style. censor what the fsf doesn't like. so that they can feel good about having less, because ideological purity is better than helping more people use coreboot, yes? Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24run coreboot utils from own directoryLeah Rowe
this means coreboot can now be distcleaned safely, before and after each build of a rom image Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-20blobs/download: exit if no board configs foundLeah Rowe
fixes ./build boot roms all in detect_firmware(), "set" is used to get values from configs, to know if things like ME/MRC are needed on some "board" configs under resources/coreboot/, no actual coreboot configs are provided, because they are used as a reference (coreboot revision, tree name etc) for actual boards, with actual coreboot configs when attempting to build for such a board, running "set" on such non-existent files would cause a non-zero exit, when we want zero. the non-zero exit then caused the build/boot/roms command to fail, when running "all" if it found, for example, resources/coreboot/cros/ which has the above problem, in this context work around it by verifying that coreboot configs exist for the given target name, in the blobutil download script. if no such configs exist, then exit zero (success) doing so is correct, because the script is intended to do just that, erroring only if it is detected that blobs are needed for a given board, but other errors occur; if no coreboot configs exist, then no roms will be built and, therefore, no blobs are needed Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-17Cache downloads based on checksumRiku Viitanen
Since many boards use the same ME firmware, we could save everyone's bandwidth and time by caching the update files. Signed-off-by: Riku Viitanen <riku.viitanen@protonmail.com>
2023-06-13Revert "Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions"Leah Rowe
This reverts commit a4ea2867319471d9fe7d4ee540881e0286b4d3cf. The licensing audit has been abandoned. I will not be re-licensing in bulk to MIT. I can still use MIT license on new works, e.g. utilities, but there's really no pressing need to re-license lbmk. It's just shell scripts, and most of what it interacts with (coreboot, grub, seabios) is GPL anyway. So who cares? Ferass's patch was removed due to refusal to re-license, but the decision to re-license has been canceled. I'm now aiming for a quick stable release.
2023-05-27blobutil: merge with main scriptLeah Rowe
make blobutil a symlink. Example of command changes: ./blobutil download x220_8mb is now: ./update blobs download x220_8mb The old command still works, for compatibility. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-27unify download/build scriptsLeah Rowe
move resources/scripts/download/ to: resources/scripts/update/module/ This: ./download coreboot Is now: ./update module coreboot However, running "./download coreboot" still works, via backwards compatibility. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-27Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributionsLeah Rowe
The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-14update/coreboot: top-down coding styleLeah Rowe
also moved hardcoded strings into variables
2022-12-27Do not rely on bashisms and behaviour undefined by the POSIX specification.Ferass 'Vitali64' EL HAFIDI
By making lbmk fully POSIX-compliant, it will be easier to port lbmk to other systems implementing POSIX such as Alpine Linux and FreeBSD. Signed-off-by: Ferass 'Vitali64' EL HAFIDI <vitali64pmemail@protonmail.com>
2022-11-14pragmatic system distribution guideline compliancepsdgLeah Rowe
osboot is now part of libreboot, and will soon shut down. libreboot now conforms to osboot policy.
2022-08-28scripts: Add helpers to modify and update U-Boot configsAlper Nebi Yasak
These are almost verbatim copies of coreboot versions, but using 'u-boot' instead of 'coreboot' and 'ub*' instead of 'cb*'. Signed-off-by: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>
2021-11-22update coreboot and nuke tianocore20211122Leah Rowe
tianocore is a liability for the libreboot project. it's a bloated mess, and unreliable, broken on many boards, and basically impossible to audit. i don't trust tianocore, so i'm removing it.
2021-06-03replace #!/bin/bash with #!/usr/bin/env bashRon Nazarov
2021-05-18libreboot!Leah Rowe
this is forked from the "libre" branch in osboot, which is itself a libre, deblobbed fork of osboot, a blobbed up fork of libreboot libreboot needed to be purged clean. this is the new libreboot development repository. the old one has been abandoned