summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/resources/scripts/build
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-07-08remove blobutil and boards/utils needing/for blobsLeah Rowe
delete all blobs. TODO: actually deblob coreboot/uboot when downloading. i'll that in a little while, in an upcoming commit. yes. purge it all, in fsf style. censor what the fsf doesn't like. so that they can feel good about having less, because ideological purity is better than helping more people use coreboot, yes? Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-07-08build/boot/roms: fix coreboot-version in releasesLeah Rowe
This error was observed, in the coreboot build system: In file included from src/lib/version.c:4: build/build.h:10:32: error: 'libreboot' undeclared here (not in a function) 10 | #define COREBOOT_MAJOR_VERSION libreboot-20230625 | ^~~~~~~~~ src/lib/version.c:35:46: note: in expansion of macro 'COREBOOT_MAJOR_VERSION' 35 | const unsigned int coreboot_major_revision = COREBOOT_MAJOR_VERSION; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This happened on the 20230625 *release archive*, when a user tried to build for W541 MRC on an Arch Linux container. This change fixes the error. I never got the error on my end when build testing the release archives, but this will prevent the error. Fix it by only inserting libreboot version string YYYYMMDD representing the Libreboot version. (libreboot uses ISO dates as version numbers) Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-25build/release/src: clean spkmodem/e6400 utilsLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-25build/roms_helper: reset d521fca7, backport fixesLeah Rowe
I keep getting random linker issues when running: ./build boot roms all I think the issue lies somewhere in here, from when I did that massive audit. So I'm undoing the audit which mostly re-factored the code style here. These changes are being backported: f338697b build/boot/roms: Support removing microcode 941fbcb run coreboot utils from own directory f256ce98 build/boot/roms: say board name on stderr I removed this change: 6d6bd5ee (the script now uses dedicated utils directory) additionally: cbutils is built much earlier on in the script, first thing after initialising variables the other changes not backported are all code style changes, and I believe these are responsible. if no other fixes occur to this fire before the next libreboot release, then my hunch was right. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-25build/boot/roms: say board name on stderrLeah Rowe
That way, I can more easily debug build issues with specific boards, e.g. ./build boot roms all 2>lbmk.err.log Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24build/roms: distclean coreboot before each buildLeah Rowe
don't clean it, distclean it Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24run coreboot utils from own directoryLeah Rowe
this means coreboot can now be distcleaned safely, before and after each build of a rom image Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24build/cbutils: distclean before buildingLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24build/cbutils: exit if utils dir doesn't existLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24build/cbutils: tab indentation, not spacesLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-24build/cbutils: rename variable for clarityLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-20build/boot/roms_helper nicer indent on switch loopLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-20build/boot/roms: remove wrong parenthesesLeah Rowe
will pass all args as a single arg, which is wrong fix that Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-20build/boot/roms: nicer indent style on switch loopLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-20build/boot/roms: only set firstoption if argc>0Leah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-20update release filesLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-19build/boot/roms: Support removing microcodeLeah Rowe
From now on, the following rules are available for all mainboards, in resources/coreboot/boardname/board.cfg: * blobs_required="n" or "y" * microcode_required="n" or "y" The blobs setting, if set to "n", simply renames filename.rom to filename_noblobs.rom. The microcode setting, if set to "n", copies the ROM (with or without _noblobs) to filename_nomicrocode.rom (if blobs="n", it would be filename_noblobs_nomicrocode.rom). Where "nomicrocode" is set, ROMs with microcode will still be provided by lbmk and in relesase, but ROMs will also be provided alongside it that lacks any microcode updates. If the *original* ROM already lacks microcode updates, then the original ROM will be *renamed* to include "nomicrocode" in the name. This is done on images for ARM platforms, for instance, where microcode is never used whatsoever. Example filenames now generated: seabios_e6400_4mb_libgfxinit_corebootfb_noblobs_nomicrocode.rom seabios_e6400_4mb_libgfxinit_corebootfb_noblobs.rom seabios_withgrub_hp8300usdt_16mb_libgfxinit_corebootfb_colemak_nomicrocode.rom seabios_withgrub_hp8300usdt_16mb_libgfxinit_corebootfb_colemak.rom uboot_payload_gru_kevin_libgfxinit_corebootfb_noblobs_nomicrocode.rom A vocal minority of people were not happy with some of the changes made in Libreboot last year, including on existing supported hardware from before those changes were made. I did this before the last release, out of respect: https://libreboot.org/news/gm45microcode.html (re-add mitigations for no-microcode setup on GM45) This new change is done as an further, extended courtesy. Tested and works fine. (testing using cbfstool-print) Actual Libreboot policy about binary blobs is nuanced. See: https://libreboot.org/news/policy.html (reduction policy) and: https://libreboot.org/freedom-status.html (implementation) Well, the status page talks about descriptor vs non-descriptor on Intel platforms, and where me_cleaner is used (on platforms that need Intel ME firmware), it regards the descriptored setups to be blob-free if coreboot does not require binary blobs. In this paradigm, microcode updates are not considered to be binary blobs, because they aren't technically software, they're more like config files that just turn certain features on or off within the CPU. However, for lbmk purposes, "noblobs" means that, after the ROM is fully ready to flash on the chip, there will be no blobs in it (except microcode). So for example, an X200 that does not require ME firmware is considered blob-free under this paradigm, even though Libreboot policy regards X230 as equally libre when me_cleaner is used; in this setup, ROMs will not contain "blobfree" in the filename, for X230 (as one example). Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-06-13Revert "Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributions"Leah Rowe
This reverts commit a4ea2867319471d9fe7d4ee540881e0286b4d3cf. The licensing audit has been abandoned. I will not be re-licensing in bulk to MIT. I can still use MIT license on new works, e.g. utilities, but there's really no pressing need to re-license lbmk. It's just shell scripts, and most of what it interacts with (coreboot, grub, seabios) is GPL anyway. So who cares? Ferass's patch was removed due to refusal to re-license, but the decision to re-license has been canceled. I'm now aiming for a quick stable release.
2023-05-27build/payload/seabios: reduced indentationLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-27Remove most of Ferass's lbmk contributionsLeah Rowe
The primary purpose of my intense auditing has been to improve lbmk's coding style and fix bugs but there is a secondary purpose: know precisely who owns what, because I want to re-license as much as possible of lbmk under *MIT*, instead of the current GNU licensing. MIT is vastly superior, because it grants *actual* freedom to the user, permits *sublicensing* and it is vastly more compatible with other GPL combinations; for example, MIT license is compatible with GPL2-only whereas lbmk's current mix of GPLv3-or-later and GPLv3-only is legally incompatible with GPLv2-only. Re-licensing under MIT will most likely result in more contributions to Libreboot's build system in the future, especially as it will attract a lot more commercial interest. Contrary to the popular arguments, copyleft is a liability to the free software movement and results in less code being written; in practise, permissively licensed code gets more public contributions, including from commercial entities, even if companies can theoretically make something proprietary out of it (in practise, anyone inclined can just use the upstream and proprietary forks almost always die). Copyleft propaganda is fundamentally flawed. See: <https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html> Anyway, I've been doing a combination of: * Seeking permission from other copyright holders, for re-licensing * Deleting, or moving, other contributions; for example, splitting certain contributions into separate files so that originally modified files become unencumbered. This latter solution is a result of *code cleanup* arising from the audit. For Ferass's contributions, I opted to seek *permission*, and permission was denied. In full compliance with this legal imperative, I'm acting accordingly; this commit removes all of Ferass's changes that converted lbmk to posix shell scripts, thus removing his copyright on the affected files, bypassing his authority entirely. Therefore, lbmk is largely now bash-dependent. In practise, nobody is going to use anything other than a GNU system to build Libreboot, because many projects that Libreboot makes use of rely heavily on GNU; for example, coreboot's build system makes heavy use of GNU-specific extensions in *GNU Make*, and likely contains many bashisms. Of course, Libreboot also compiles GNU GRUB. I would much rather have MIT-licensed Bash scripts than GPL-licensed posix SCL scripts. This reverts the changes from Ferass El Hafidi, for the following commits, with some exceptions: * 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 * f787044642236917c9c4dbcaa48a6b0648097db0 Exception: download/mrc not reverted, because that was already a fork of an existing script under coreboot's build system, and their script was GPLv2. i cannot/will not re-license this file (ergo, 7f5dfebf7d37c56d9c7993aaa17c59070cb5aec9 change remains intact, on this file) resources/scripts/build/boot/roms_helper, these changes have been kept: * 7e6691e9 - Add ARMv7 and AArch64 support * dec2d720 - add myself in the build/roms_helper script (added 2021 copyright for the change below) * b7405656 - Workaround for grub's slow boot ^ these changes will be re-factored, splitting them out of the file into a new file. This will be done in a future lbmk revision. (in some cases, it makes sense to keep a change but split it, allowing the main file to be re-licensed without the change in it) This is part of a much larger series of licensing audits. It's likely that lbmk will be posix-compliant (in its shell scripts) again some day, because I'm planning to rewrite most of these scripts (the ones modified in this patch), and many of them (e.g. individual download scripts) are subject to future deletion in a planned overhaul of the download logic for third party projects. In addition: these changes are being kept (no attempt to re-license them will be made): * cff081c6 - Fix grub's slow boot (1 year, 5 months ago) <Vitali64> * 4c851889 - Add macbook*1 16mb configs (1 year, 6 months ago) <Vitali64> Ferass's work that remains will be split into dedicated files containing them, where feasible. In the case of grub.cfg (for GNU GRUB), I don't care because it's a script for an engine (GRUB shell) that's under GPL anyway, so who really cares about MIT license. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/clean/u-boot: remove unnecesssary checkLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/clean/u-boot: improved coding styleLeah Rowe
tabs for indentation simplify some checks
2023-05-20build/clean/ich9utils: don't use subshellLeah Rowe
this also fixes error handling Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/u-boot: top-down, split-function code styleLeah Rowe
main() on top top-down order of logic logic split into separate functions Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/payload/u-boot: 79 chars or less per lineLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/payload/u-boot: fix wrong attributionsLeah Rowe
only alper and ferass have ownership of this file, but ferass only submitted to it in 2022, not 2021 fix this i've removed myself from the file, for now i never touched this file before, so it's not right that my name be here put alper's name at the top, because alper was the person who created this file first Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/payload/grub: rename functions for clarityLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/payload/grub: remove unnecessary checkLeah Rowe
sed does the same job as cp, in this situation Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/payload/grub: split logic into functionsLeah Rowe
main() on top top-down logic Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/payload/grub: 79 chars or less per lineLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/roms: minor cleanupLeah Rowe
split actual purging of blobs to a function rename functions for clarity
2023-05-20build/release/roms: handle argument properlyLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/roms: remove superfluous commentsLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/roms: handle errors inside subshellLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/roms: split logic into functionsLeah Rowe
main() on top top-down logic 79 chars or less, per line Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/roms: use tabs for indentationLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/src: 79 chars or less per code lineLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/src: handle errors in subshellsLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/release/src: split logic into functionsLeah Rowe
main() on top top-down logic Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/ich9utils: simplify, fix error handlingLeah Rowe
errors weren't being handled inside a subshell Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/memtest86plus: use tabs for indentationLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/clean/crossgcc: better code styleLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/descriptors: simplify and fix error handlingLeah Rowe
main() on top some parts of the script weren't erroring properly Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/grub: fix inconsistent indentationLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/grub: implement error handlingLeah Rowe
it uses a subshell, so errors weren't observed Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/grub: introduce main(), split it upLeah Rowe
easier to read Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/cbutils: remove unnecessary directory checkLeah Rowe
it will already fail if the coreboot download did. if the coreboot download succeeds, the directory exists. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/cbutils: rename function for clarityLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/cbutil: avoid frivilous use of subshellsLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-05-20build/cbutils: top-down coding style, main on topLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>