summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/config/coreboot/e6430_12mb/target.cfg
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-06-22lib.sh: more unified config handlingLeah Rowe
replace it with logic that simply uses "." to load files directly. for this, "vcfg" is added as a variable in coreboot target.cfg files, referring to a directory in config/vendor/ containing a file named pkg.cfg, and this file then contains the same variables as the erstwhile config/vendor/sources config/git files are now directories, also containing pkg.cfg files each with the same variables as before, such as repository link and commit hash this change results in a noticeable reduction in code complexity within the build system. unified reading of config files: new function setcfg() added to lib.sh setcfg checks if a config exists. if a 2nd argument is passed, it is used as a return value for eval, otherwise a string calling err is passed. setcfg output is passed through eval, to set strings based on config; eval must be used, so that the variables are set within the same scope, otherwise they'd be set within setcfg which could lead to some whacky results. there's still a bit more more to do, but this single change results in a substantial reduction in code complexity. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-27re-configure grub_scan_disk on various targetsLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-27remove grub_scan_disk in all target.cfg filesLeah Rowe
A subsequest revision will set them again as needed, per coreboot target. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-27coreboot: only run GRUB as a secondary payloadLeah Rowe
See: https://codeberg.org/libreboot/lbmk/issues/216 Almost all users will be OK running GRUB, but a minority of users have experienced a fatal error pertaining to grub_free() or grub_realloc() (as my investigation of GRUB sources reveal when grepping the error reported in the link above). We don't yet know what the bug is, only that the error occurs, leading to an effective brick if the user has GRUB as their primary payload. So far, it has only been reported on some Intel SandyBridge-based Dell Latitudes in Libreboot, but we can't be too sure. The user reported that memtest86+ passes just fine, and SeaBIOS works; BIOS GRUB also works, which means that the bug is likely only in an area of GRUB that runs specifically on the coreboot payload, so it's probably a driver in GRUB when running on the metal rather than BIOS/UEFI. The build system supports a configuration whereby SeaBIOS is the primary payload, but GRUB is available in the SeaBIOS boot select menu, and an additional configuration is available where GRUB is what SeaBIOS executes first (while still providing boot select); both of these are now the *only* configurations available, on all x86 targets except QEMU. The QEMU target is fine because if the bug occurs there, you can just close QEMU and try a different image. Even after this bug is later identified and fixed, the GRUB source code is vastly over-engineered and there are likely many more such bugs. SeaBIOS is a reliable payload; the code is small and robust. Remember always: Code equals bugs Therefore, this configuration change is likely going to be permanent. This will apply in the next release. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-11remove all status checks. only handle release.Leah Rowe
the release variable is all we need, turning a target on or off for a given release. the status checks were prone to bugs, and unnecessary; it also broke certain benchmark scripts. it's better to keep the lbmk logic simpler. board status will be moved to the documentation instead. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-04coreboot: update latitude release statusLeah Rowe
working s3 means i'm happy to mark it as being stable. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-01correct dell latitude status for releaseLeah Rowe
it should be marked unstable, though these machines are basically reliable; they have certain missing features and quirky behaviour so it's important not to over-sell it mark it as unstable, on all of the dell latitudes Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-05-01set dell latitudes stable for releaseLeah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-04-27Set status=unstable on dell latitudesLeah Rowe
also warn about issues, in a warn.txt file for each. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2024-04-26build/roms: report status when building imagesLeah Rowe
export LBMK_VERSION_TYPE=x x can be: stable, unstable in target.cfg files, specify: status=x x can be: stable, unstable, broken, untested if unset, lbmk defaults to "unknown" if LBMK_VERSION_TYPE is set, no confirmation is asked if the given target matches what's set (but what's set in that environmental variable can only be stable or unstable) if LBMK_RELEASE="y", no confirmation is asked, unless the target is something other than stable/unstable "unstable" means it works, but has a few non-breaking bugs, e.g. broken s3 on dell e6400 whereas, if raminit regularly fails or it is so absolutely unreliable as to be unusable, then the board should be declared "broken" untested means: it has not been tested With this change, it should now be easier to track whether a given board is tested, in preparation for releases. When working on trees/boards, status can be set for targets. Also: in the board directory, you can add a "warn.txt" file which will display a message. For example, if a board has a particular quirk to watch out for, write that there. The message will be printed during the build process, to stdout. If status is anything *other* than stable, or it is unstable but LBMK_VERSION_TYPE is not set to "unstable", and not building a release, a confirmation is passed. If the board is not specified as stable or unstable, during a release build, the build is skipped and the ROM is not provided in that release; this is in *addition* to release="n" or release="y" that can be set in target.cfg, which will skip the release build for that target if "n" Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-27update/trees: further simplify crossgcc handlingLeah Rowe
arch no longer needs to be set, on multi-tree projects, and it has been renamed to xarch the new behaviour is: if xarch is set, treat it as a list of crossgcc targets and go through the list. set the first one as the target, for what lbmk builds, but build all of the defined crossgccc targets crossgcc_ada is now xlang, and defines which languages to build, rather than whether to build gcc-gnat Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-23don't delete microcode updates in rom imagesLeah Rowe
at present, lbmk can remove microcode updates on images for a given target, if the target specifies microcode_required="n" in target.cfg lbmk then provides images with microcode, and images without, in a given release. although the user can also remove them manually, this just makes it a bit more convenient, for those users who do wish to run without the updates. this functionality is provided only on those platforms where no-microcode is tested. well, this behaviour implements a compromise on libreboot policy, which is to always include microcode updates by default. see: Binary Blob Reduction Policy the *canoeboot* project now exists, developed in parallel with libreboot, and it ships without microcode updates, on the same targets where lbmk also handled this. running without microcode updates is foolish, and should not be encouraged. clean up lbmk by not providing this kludge. the libreboot documentation will be updated, telling such users to try canoeboot instead, or to remove the update from a given libreboot rom - this is still possible, and mitigations such as PECI disablement on GM45 are still in place (and will be kept), so that this continues to work well. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-21build/roms: remove modify_coreboot_rom()Leah Rowe
don't handle "romtype" at all, in board target.cfg files add /dev/null as pike2008 rom on amd boards. this serves the same purpose, adding them as empty vga roms, to add an empty rom in cbfs. pike2008 cards cause seabios to hang, when their oproms are executed, so we insert a fake rom on i945 thinkpads, use the coreboot config option: CONFIG_INTEL_ADD_TOP_SWAP_BOOTBLOCK when set, this enables the same bootblock copy, for use with bucts. these two cases, namely pike2008 roms and i945 bootblock copies, no longer need to be handled in code Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-12-21update/trees: simplified crossgcc handlingLeah Rowe
only call crossgcc for coreboot and u-boot, but use hostcc for everything else. simplify the checking of which architecture to compile for. "arch" in target.cfg files has been modified, to allow further simplification. without this patch, the logic currently only *barely* avoids using crossgcc on things like utils, and only works in practise because, in practise, lbmk only works on x86_64 anyway. the new logic, as per this patch, is simpler and more robust. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-11-01Libreboot 2023110120231101Leah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-10-31fix grub keyboard init on dell e6400 and e6430Leah Rowe
also, enable seabios_withgrub on e6400, but not grubfirst; right now, we also support dgpu which would brick on grubfirst. on my tested nvidia model, loading grub from seabios worked, so i'm going to re-add seabios_grubfirst functionality like in older libreboot revisions, enabled selectively on a given target. e6430 currently only has igpu support anyway, but i've done the same thing there, in anticipation of future dgpu support. e6400 and e6430 ec report scancode set 2 with translation by default, but only actually output scancode set 1 grub is trying to use scancode set 2 without scancode translation, so the key inputs get messed up fix it by forcing scancode set 2 with translation, but only on coreboot; other build targets on GRUB will retain the same behaviour as before courtesy goes to Nicholas Chin who inspired me, and helped me to fix this. tested on Nicholas's E6400 and E6430, and my E6400; Riku also tested it on non-Dell, as did I (some thinkpads), and all seems OK. The new behaviour in coreboot GRUB is essentially no different to that of SeaBIOS, which does the same. Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
2023-09-04merge config/ and resources/Leah Rowe
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>