| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
working s3 means i'm happy to mark it as being stable.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
it should be marked unstable, though these machines
are basically reliable; they have certain missing features
and quirky behaviour so it's important not to over-sell it
mark it as unstable, on all of the dell latitudes
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
some latitudes still used the old style for variables
in target.cfg, specifically arch="x86_64" - lbmk used to
then check that on a big if/else and translate it to the
correct target name for crossgcc, e.g. i386-elf, arm-eabi
now it just puts the arch directly, in a new variable:
xarch
change arch="x86_64" to xarch="i386-elf" in these files.
also remove a few obsolete variables. should build now.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
also warn about issues, in a warn.txt file for each.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
export LBMK_VERSION_TYPE=x
x can be: stable, unstable
in target.cfg files, specify:
status=x
x can be: stable, unstable, broken, untested
if unset, lbmk defaults to "unknown"
if LBMK_VERSION_TYPE is set, no confirmation is asked
if the given target matches what's set (but what's set
in that environmental variable can only be stable or
unstable)
if LBMK_RELEASE="y", no confirmation is asked, unless
the target is something other than stable/unstable
"unstable" means it works, but has a few non-breaking
bugs, e.g. broken s3 on dell e6400
whereas, if raminit regularly fails or it is so absolutely
unreliable as to be unusable, then the board should be
declared "broken"
untested means: it has not been tested
With this change, it should now be easier to track whether
a given board is tested, in preparation for releases. When
working on trees/boards, status can be set for targets.
Also: in the board directory, you can add a "warn.txt" file
which will display a message. For example, if a board has a
particular quirk to watch out for, write that there. The message
will be printed during the build process, to stdout.
If status is anything *other* than stable, or it is unstable
but LBMK_VERSION_TYPE is not set to "unstable", and not building
a release, a confirmation is passed.
If the board is not specified as stable or unstable, during
a release build, the build is skipped and the ROM is not
provided in that release; this is in *addition* to
release="n" or release="y" that can be set in target.cfg,
which will skip the release build for that target if "n"
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
|
|
Tested by Minimum_Baseball_629 on Reddit
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
|
|
this was done automatically by running:
./update trees -u coreboot
this has to be done when adding patches for now board ports,
because of the way lbmk and also coreboot's build systems work.
the configs just have to be re-generated to include a line
that says the entry for the newly added boards isn't set. look
at the diff of this commit as an example.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
|
|
Tested by Martin Dawson.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
|
|
Tested by Martin Dawson.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
|
|
Tested by Martin Dawson.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
|
