summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/util/e6400-flash-unlock/Makefile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLeah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>2023-07-08 21:00:05 +0100
committerLeah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>2023-07-08 21:00:05 +0100
commit6bc619db902015af208f2b3d2321708e1db9da11 (patch)
treee2573089390fb02c481f03f27930052f66642206 /util/e6400-flash-unlock/Makefile
parentcc30a1c6fa5bce5cbc4c38741b4fe3cc60810f1e (diff)
rename project to c-libreboot (c = censored)
because that's what fsdg policy is: censorship fsf will censor any existence of less-than-pure hardware from coreboot, despite the fact that coreboot provides more freedom for the user than fully proprietary firmware, even in cases where blobs are needed. i criticise that here: https://libreboot.org/news/policy.html FSF's fork of libreboot, formerly libreboot.at and now named GNU Boot*, is still based on old lbmk from october 2022, they haven't written *any* code since December 2022 when they supposedly first started working on the fork i'm doing a gnuboot for them, purely for fun, called c-libreboot. c-libreboot is essentially the same as old libreboot, prior to the osboot merge, but i'm including all the new things such as dell latitude e6400 or gru chromebooks, all of which are suitable under the old libreboot policy and, by extension, GNU Boot policy *URL: https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnuboot/ (it actually is a GNU project, though the FSF has not yet announced it officially, as I write this) Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'util/e6400-flash-unlock/Makefile')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions