diff options
author | Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org> | 2023-07-08 21:00:05 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org> | 2023-07-08 21:00:05 +0100 |
commit | 6bc619db902015af208f2b3d2321708e1db9da11 (patch) | |
tree | e2573089390fb02c481f03f27930052f66642206 /util/e6400-flash-unlock/COPYING | |
parent | cc30a1c6fa5bce5cbc4c38741b4fe3cc60810f1e (diff) |
rename project to c-libreboot (c = censored)
because that's what fsdg policy is: censorship
fsf will censor any existence of less-than-pure hardware
from coreboot, despite the fact that coreboot provides
more freedom for the user than fully proprietary firmware,
even in cases where blobs are needed. i criticise that here:
https://libreboot.org/news/policy.html
FSF's fork of libreboot, formerly libreboot.at and now
named GNU Boot*, is still based on old lbmk from october
2022, they haven't written *any* code since December 2022
when they supposedly first started working on the fork
i'm doing a gnuboot for them, purely for fun, called
c-libreboot. c-libreboot is essentially the same as old
libreboot, prior to the osboot merge, but i'm including
all the new things such as dell latitude e6400 or gru
chromebooks, all of which are suitable under the old
libreboot policy and, by extension, GNU Boot policy
*URL: https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnuboot/
(it actually is a GNU project, though the FSF has
not yet announced it officially, as I write this)
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'util/e6400-flash-unlock/COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions