From 7a66c7801698e8d191942d862e22964b3430f502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Rowe Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:43:06 +0000 Subject: util/nvmutil: don't use SSIZE_MAX (not portable) some old systems don't have ssize_t or size_t Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe --- util/nvmutil/nvmutil.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/util/nvmutil/nvmutil.c b/util/nvmutil/nvmutil.c index f48413d4..4db3d582 100644 --- a/util/nvmutil/nvmutil.c +++ b/util/nvmutil/nvmutil.c @@ -543,8 +543,8 @@ static const char *mac_str = rmac; static const char *fname = NULL; static const char *argv0; -#ifndef SSIZE_MAX -#define SSIZE_MAX ((ssize_t)(~((size_t)1 << (sizeof(ssize_t)*CHAR_BIT-1)))) +#ifndef X_LONG_MAX +#define X_LONG_MAX ((long)(~((long)1 << (sizeof(long)*CHAR_BIT-1)))) #endif /* @@ -2586,7 +2586,7 @@ io_args(int fd, void *mem, size_t nrw, goto err_io_args; /* prevent overflow */ - if (nrw > (size_t)SSIZE_MAX) + if (nrw > (size_t)X_LONG_MAX) goto err_io_args; /* prevent overflow */ @@ -2639,14 +2639,14 @@ rw_over_nrw(ssize_t r, size_t nrw) if (r == -1) return r; - if ((size_t)r > SSIZE_MAX) { + if ((size_t)r > X_LONG_MAX) { /* * Theoretical buggy libc * check. Extremely academic. * * Specifications never * allow this return value - * to exceed SSIZE_MAX, but + * to exceed SSIZE_T, but * spec != implementation * * Check this after using -- cgit v1.2.1