lbmk.git/util/e6400-flash-unlock, branch 20241205 libreboot build system (LibreBoot MaKe) util/e6400-flash-unlock: Rename to dell-flash-unlock 2023-10-12T23:57:06+00:00 Nicholas Chin nic.c3.14@gmail.com 2023-10-12T23:57:06+00:00 5d6946c42cf8faa64f609155cf3b121ff8d78474 This more accurately describes the scope of the utility. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com> 
This more accurately describes the scope of the utility.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
util/e6400-flash-unlock: Update to upstream version 2023-10-10T05:16:18+00:00 Nicholas Chin nic.c3.14@gmail.com 2023-10-10T04:36:33+00:00 724cb39f867de2e1eacc470eb348c2f7bdf82c18 This updates lbmk's copy of e6400-flash-unlock to commit c5567fece479 (README.md: Update with info about broader device support) in my upstream repo. Changes: - Theoretical support for any Dell system that implements that flash descriptor override command. This is done by reading base address registers at runtime instead of hard coding them for specific devices. Tested on the Latitude E6400 and Latitude E6430. - Support for OpenBSD. It compiles, runs, and behaves as expected, though I have not actually tested internally flashing with flashrom yet. It should work though, as the program checks if the descriptor override is set and the BIOS Write Enable is able to be set to 1, which is all that is needed to internal flash. - Integrated changes made in the lbmk copy - Moved operating system accessor implementations to their own file It should be fully functional, though minor formatting and cleanup changes are still planned. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com> 
This updates lbmk's copy of e6400-flash-unlock to commit c5567fece479
(README.md: Update with info about broader device support) in my
upstream repo.

Changes:
- Theoretical support for any Dell system that implements that flash
  descriptor override command. This is done by reading base address
  registers at runtime instead of hard coding them for specific devices.
  Tested on the Latitude E6400 and Latitude E6430.
- Support for OpenBSD. It compiles, runs, and behaves as expected,
  though I have not actually tested internally flashing with flashrom
  yet. It should work though, as the program checks if the descriptor
  override is set and the BIOS Write Enable is able to be set to 1, which
  is all that is needed to internal flash.
- Integrated changes made in the lbmk copy
- Moved operating system accessor implementations to their own file

It should be fully functional, though minor formatting and cleanup
changes are still planned.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
util/: use SPDX license and copyright headers 2023-09-25T01:49:34+00:00 Leah Rowe leah@libreboot.org 2023-09-25T01:49:34+00:00 b727f9666b457666efaa861caeb7d1ed73e646c3 Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org> 
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
util/e6400-flash-unlock: clean up commented code 2023-05-29T21:01:41+00:00 Leah Rowe leah@libreboot.org 2023-05-29T21:01:41+00:00 8df2f8095e11aa4995906856bf3d9396890c6dd5 Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org> 
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
util/e6400-flash-unlock: do void on ec_fdo_command 2023-04-30T13:07:02+00:00 Leah Rowe leah@libreboot.org 2023-04-30T13:07:02+00:00 f49eccee72973c7b582fbd623545af2a58493f61 the return value was never used 
the return value was never used
don't force console mode in grub 2023-04-24T12:14:23+00:00 Leah Rowe leah@libreboot.org 2023-04-24T12:14:23+00:00 6588be675f34436cfef7d41e630e47fda995fa14 the deleted patch (in this commit) was written to fix an issue theoretically; it hasn't been fully tested, and some people have reported strange issues since this patch was merged - there is no proof that this patch causes them, but removing this patch is the correct thing to do regardless 
the deleted patch (in this commit) was written to fix an
issue theoretically; it hasn't been fully tested, and some
people have reported strange issues since this patch was
merged - there is no proof that this patch causes them, but
removing this patch is the correct thing to do regardless
util/e6400-flash-unlock: restore README 2023-04-19T17:40:04+00:00 Nicholas Chin nic.c3.14@gmail.com 2023-04-19T17:37:39+00:00 eb32e4932738cb2901a5118c9e511c0191382388 when nicholas added this, he removed the README because it's going on libreboot.org instead. however, i merged a WIP version of his page for now because i want to get the e6400 going in libreboot sooner. so, temp-readding this README. will just link to this on codeberg or something, from the lb docs NOTE: I didn't write this README, hence author field set in the commit. Nicholas wrote it, but I (Leah Rowe) am just adding it. so, git author set to nicholas, not me 
when nicholas added this, he removed the README because it's
going on libreboot.org instead. however, i merged a WIP version
of his page for now because i want to get the e6400 going in
libreboot sooner. so, temp-readding this README. will just
link to this on codeberg or something, from the lb docs

NOTE: I didn't write this README, hence author field set
in the commit. Nicholas wrote it, but I (Leah Rowe) am just
adding it. so, git author set to nicholas, not me
Add E6400 flash unlock utility 2023-04-19T06:31:33+00:00 Nicholas Chin nic.c3.14@gmail.com 2023-04-19T06:26:39+00:00 a11f2d2e5e41381e39b689fe57492bdd79def2e0 Adding it to lbmk for now as it is not yet in coreboot. If it is merged into coreboot we can just reference the one there. The original README will be incorporated into a new page on lbwww, so README.md just points to a placeholder URL that should match the new page. 
Adding it to lbmk for now as it is not yet in coreboot. If it is merged
into coreboot we can just reference the one there. The original README
will be incorporated into a new page on lbwww, so README.md just points
to a placeholder URL that should match the new page.