now the docs are complete, in releases. they
contain the libreboot site, libreboot images,
the untitled static site generator and untitled
static site generator documentation.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

i haven't updated site.cfg yet

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

with this, you can just do:

cd src/docs

./build

the html files would then be available for
publishing, if you wish, or you could set up
a local httpd to view them.

if you have pandoc installed, this will build the
markdown files into html

untitled static site generator is what generates
the html files, from the markdown files, on the
website. it will now also be included in releases.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

it's not used by anywhere else in lbmk, but the release build
script will automatically download each project named as per
file names in config/git/

this is a stupidly simply way to prove documentation in
libreboot releases, and i've used current revisions corresponding
to the Libreboot 20231021 release, for this 20231021 release
of lbmk.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>

notabug is unreliable, even as a backup.

why, just today, it was offline! all day.

i originally moved libreboot away from notabug,
to codeberg instead, but kept the notabug account
online, and i still push to it when it's online.

however, notabug seems to be in a terminal state
of neglect by its admins, so lbmk should not use it.

Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>